« Adding people makes all software better | Main | Conservative coding »

Re: How to beat Google

It's got to be a slow news day at ZDnet if apparent inconsistenencies in my blog posts over the past 4 months are news. :-)

Credit to Donna for actually noticing and calling me on it though. But to try to clear things up a bit:

Many interpreted my winner-take-all post from January to mean that I thought startups shouldn't attempt to compete against Google. Not at all. In fact, I think startups are the only chance against Google. You need some kind of disruptive or market-changing innovation to succeed, since Google is just so damn good. For a variety of reasons, I think it's really hard for big companies to do that kind of work internally.

The comments on how to beat google have been really interesting. In particular this livesearch.alltheweb.com thing is kinda nifty. I guess it doesn't look like a Google killer to me, but I like it anyway.

Also the folks on Threadwatch reminded me about the raffle model. Iwon.com used this and acquired quite a bit of traffic quickly. Basically you run a lottery and give a million bucks or something to a random user of your search engine every day. Now Iwon was icky and no one in the search industry likes to think like a sweepstakes marketer, but the idea does have some pull.

Think about it this way. Google collects billions of dollars from advertisers. They fund a lot of non-search stuff over there. Where else could that money go? How about a loyalty rebate program back to users? Marketers have proposed various attention-buying schemes over the years. That's essentially what your Safeway or Harrah's card is. It's paying you money in return for your behavioral data, and permission to market to you. Loyalty and cash back programs are really popular and sticky. Now 5% cash back on my searches is bupkus, but if you pooled together everyone's and gave it all to one person every day...

That's crazy talk, even for me. ;-)

Comments (3)

This is what MSFT is trying to do in the corporate environment.... encouraging IT managers to make Live Search the default, encourage "top down" recommendations to use Live in exchange for credit for Microsoft products.

I'm not sure what's worse - being Slashdotted or Bogatinned. Congrats, Rich. Your devious flip-flopping is now exposed to the world!

Gopi:

In theory it looks that this will automatically attract users but in reality its not. Blingo even with the marketing muscle of PCH is not doing that great!.

BTB, anyone with a adsense account can easily create a reward based search engine.


Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 28, 2007 7:40 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Adding people makes all software better.

The next post in this blog is Conservative coding.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33